Drive Engineering Execution
· Lead complex, cross-domain engineering initiatives from definition through delivery.
· Establish clear outcomes, ownership, milestones, dependencies, risks, and decision points.
· Drive resolution of execution gaps and escalate issues requiring leadership decisions.
· Run operating cadences that focus leaders on decisions, exceptions, and tradeoffs—not status collection.
· Apply the appropriate level of rigor based on technical complexity, risk, and mission consequence.
· Establish and operate an agentic project-management model for lower-complexity engineering initiatives.
· Determine which work requires human program leadership and which can be effectively managed through agents.
· Use agents to automate routine coordination, status synthesis, milestone tracking, evidence collection, and risk identification.
· Define escalation paths and human-in-the-loop controls for ambiguity, exceptions, and consequential decisions.
· Partner with the Agentic Engineering Lead to improve agent capabilities, context, and integration with Engineering systems of record.
· Measure whether agentic project management is increasing execution coverage while reducing administrative burden.
Operate the Engineering Portfolio
· Run quarterly engineering planning and portfolio operating cadences.
· Maintain visibility into initiative health, cross-team dependencies, resource conflicts, and delivery risks.
· Partner with Product Operations and Engineering leaders on roadmap alignment and execution.
· Create concise, trustworthy portfolio views that allow leaders to quickly identify where intervention is needed.
· Improve the quality of execution data in Engineering’s authoritative systems of record.
· Identify recurring execution friction and translate it into improvements to the Engineering operating model.
· Reduce manual coordination, reporting, and unnecessary ceremony.
· Partner with the Engineering Operations Principal on standards, governance, and operating-model improvements.