Some of the strongest candidates may have spent years in adjacent sectors — social welfare, public health, education, social protection, feminist movements, or financing — carrying a deep commitment to GBV and WPE work without a formal WPE title. If you have followed this field closely, hold a genuine view on where it needs to go, and have built the cross-sector fluency to help take it there, we encourage you to apply or to reach out with questions before doing so.
This role is for someone who loves this field enough to want to see it move beyond itself, and who can hold a clear vision of the shifts it needs without losing sight of what makes it worth fighting for. Someone who has seen what survivor-centered, feminist, rights-based programming can do at its best, and who is equally clear-eyed about the ways the sector has sometimes missed opportunities, been left out of innovations that social services in other contexts have leveraged for better impact and scale, and built protection frameworks that keep women safe in the short term while leaving the structural conditions of violence entirely intact.
We are not looking for someone who mistakes disruption for progress, but for someone who leverages activist conviction for concrete change in policy and implementation. Someone who holds an uncompromising commitment to the rights of all women and girls in crisis alongside a clear-eyed understanding of the specific opportunities the WPE sector can champion in advancing those rights: not to carry the entire women’s rights agenda, but to ensure that our sector’s focus on safety and empowerment is ambitious, strategic, and transformative — and to bring the intellectual honesty to continuously ask whether we are adequately challenging the systems that enable violence, not only responding when it occurs.
IRC is a global organization embedded in systems of power and bureaucracy. Part of this role’s mandate is to engage those systems strategically, not only position against them. We are looking for someone with the integrity to use access and influence for the people this work is meant to serve: neither naive about institutional constraints nor paralyzed by them. If you derive more satisfaction from naming power imbalances than shifting them, we thank you because this work is important, but this is not the role for you. If you know how to do both, we want to hear from you.